Abbas Ghaedamini Harouni; Reza Ebrahimzadeh Dastjerdi; Mehrdad Sadeghi; Majed Maharani Barzani
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Islamic leadership on deviant behaviors in the workplace through Islamic work ethic and social capital (case study of Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan)). The present study was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of how to collect ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Islamic leadership on deviant behaviors in the workplace through Islamic work ethic and social capital (case study of Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan)). The present study was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of how to collect descriptive information of the correlation type. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all employees working in Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 1000, and 287 people were selected through Cochran's sampling formula as a sample. Ugansula (2011), Bennett and Robinson (2000) Standard Deviation Behavior Questionnaire and Nahapitogoshal Social Capital Questionnaire, (1998), and Ali's (1988) standard work-ethics standard questionnaire validated questionnaires based on content validity., Formal and structural were examined and after the necessary narrative terms, the validity of the questionnaires was estimated and analyzed by Cronbach's alpha method of 0.93, 0.91, 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. Data analysis at the inferential level consisted of structural equation modeling. The results showed that Islamic leadership has a negative and significant effect on deviant behaviors in the workplace through Islamic work ethic, which has a coefficient of -0.78, and through social capital has a negative and significant effect on deviant behaviors in the workplace. The coefficient of this effect is -0.67 and also the direct effect of Islamic leadership on deviant behaviors in the work environment is significantly negative. The coefficient of this effect is -0.77.
Mehrdad Sadeghi decheshme; Reza Ebrahimzadeh Dastjerdi; Abbas Ghaedamini Harouni; Majed Maharani Barzani
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of knowledge management on commitment to change through the quality of communication perceived from change and readiness for change. The present study was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of how to collect descriptive information of the correlation ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of knowledge management on commitment to change through the quality of communication perceived from change and readiness for change. The present study was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of how to collect descriptive information of the correlation type. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all 1000 employees of the Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan) who were selected through Cochran's sampling formula. For example, 287 people were selected through a class sampling method appropriate to the volume. 2003 (Standard Questionnaire Commitment to Changing Fedor et al. (2009), Standard Communication Questionnaire Understanding Changing Miller and Mang (1985), and Standard Standard Questionnaire on Challenging et al. (2007). Content validity was analyzed using expert opinion based on the views of a number of statistical and structural communities using factor analysis and after the necessary terminology, validity was confirmed. The sequence of knowledge management (0.93) and commitment commitment to change (0.81) and the perceived communication from change (0.85) and readiness readiness questionnaire (0.92) were estimated, respectively. Data were used at the inferential level to model structural equations Given that knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on the commitment to change through readiness to change, the coefficient of this effect is 0.55, but through the quality of the relationship on commitment to change does not have a significant effect on direct commitment to change has a positive and significant effect. The coefficient of this effect is 0.66.
